kw.\*:("VARIABILITE TAUX RENFORCEMENT")
Results 1 to 25 of 186
Selection :
SUCCESSIVE INCENSIVE SHIFTS WITH IMMATURE AND MATURE RATS = MODIFICATIONS SUCCESSIVES DU RENFORCEMENT CHEZ LE RAT JEUNE ET ADULTESAYEED H; WOLACH AH.1972; JAP. PSYCHOL. RES.; JAP.; DA. 1972; VOL. 14; NO 2; PP. 54-60; BIBL. 16 REF.Article
AN INEXPENSIVE DEVICE FOR PROGRAMMING RATIO REINFORCEMENT = UNE TECHNIQUE PEU COUTEUSE POUR LA PROGRAMMATION DU TAUX DE RENFORCEMENTKAUFFMAN JM; CULLIMAN D; SCRANTON TR et al.1972; PSYCHOL. REC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 22; NO 4; PP. 543-544; BIBL. 3REF.Article
AFTER EFFECTS OF REINFORCEMENT ON VARIABLE-RATIO SCHEDULES.PRIDDLE HIGSON PJ; LOWE CF; HARZEM P et al.1976; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 25; NO 3; PP. 347-354; BIBL. 17 REF.Article
CHOICE AND SELF-CONTROL IN CHILDREN: A TEST OF RACHLIN'S MODEL = CHOIX ET AUTO-CONTROLE CHEZ LES ENFANTS: UN TEST DU MODELE DE RACHLINBURNS DJ; POWERS RB.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 156-158; BIBL. 3REFArticle
EFFECTS OF DELAY OF REINFORCEMENT AND INCENTIVE VALUE ON CHILDREN'S LEVER PULLING RESPONSE.SHIROIWA Y.1975; JAP. PSYCHOL. RES.; JAP.; DA. 1975; VOL. 17; NO 1; PP. 17-24; BIBL. 16 REF.Article
COMBINATIONS OF RESPONSE-REINFORCER DEPENDANCE AND INDEPENDANCE = COMBINAISONS DE LA DEPENDANCE ET DE L'INDEPENDANCE RENFORCEMENT-REPONSELATTAL KA.1974; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 357-362; BIBL. 10REF.Article
THE ROLE OF LOCAL INTERACTIONS IN BEHAVIORAL CONTRASTWILLIAMS BA.1974; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 4; NO 6; PP. 543-545; BIBL. 11REFArticle
AN INCENTIVE EFFECT IN THERMALLY MOTIVATED BEHAVIORMATTHEWS JJ; PINSKY SD; STRAX R et al.1974; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 2; NO 3; PP. 173-176; BIBL. 15REF.Article
NEGATIVE S- CONTRAST WITH MINIMAL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS IN S+WERK S; MCHOSE JH.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 1; PP. 25-27; BIBL. 6REF.Article
POSITIVE CONTRAST OBTAINED IN RATS FOLLOWING A SHIFT IN SCHEDULE, DELAY, AND MAGNITUDE OF REWARD = CONTRASTE POSITIF OBTENU CHEZ DES RATS SUIVANT UN CHANGEMENT DANS LE PROGRAMME, DELAI ET IMPORTANCE DU RENFORCEMENTSHANAB ME; CAVALLARO G.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 5; NO 2; PP. 109-112; BIBL. 15REFArticle
RUNWAY PERFORMANCE OF NORMAL, SHAM, AND ANOSMIC RATS AS A FUNCTION OF MAGNITUDE OF REWARD AND MAGNITUDE SHIFT.DAVIS SF; HARPER WE.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 4A; PP. 367-369; BIBL. 6 REF.Article
SHIFTS IN MAGNITUDE OF REWARD WITH HUMANS IN THE "STRAIGHTAWAY".COX WM; WEITZ JR; LIEBERMAN LR et al.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 1-3; BIBL. 7 REF.Article
"THINKING AHEAD" IN RAT DISCRIMINATION LEARNING.HULSE SH; CAMPBELL CE.1975; ANIMAL LEARNG BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 3; NO 4; PP. 305-311; BIBL. 19 REF.Article
EFFECT OF REWARD SEQUENCE ON EXTINCTION AND SPONTANEOUS RECOVERY = EFFET DE LA SEQUENCE DU RENFORCEMENT SUR L'EXTINCTION ET LA RECUPERATION SPONTANEEBOYER WN; CROSS HA.1972; PERCEPT. MOTOR SKILLS; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 35; NO 2; PP. 668-670; BIBL. 4REF.Article
TRANSFER OF FIXED AND VARIABLE-INTERVAL SCHEDULE CONTROL = LE TRANSFERT DU CONTROLE DE RENFORCEMENT A INTERVALLES FIXES OU VARIABLESCARLSON JG; WIELKIEWICZ RM; MODJESKI RB et al.1972; PSYCHOL. REC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1972; VOL. 22; NO 4; PP. 531-542; BIBL. 10REF.Article
DISCRIMINATIVE STIMULUS LOCATION AS A DETERMINANT OF POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST IN THE PIGEONSCHWARTZ B.1975; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 23; NO 2; PP. 167-176; BIBL. 24REF.Article
MATCHING AND CONTRAST ON SEVERAL CONCURRENT TREADLE-PRESS SCHEDULESMCSWEENEY FK.1975; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 23; NO 2; PP. 193-198; BIBL. 14REF.Article
THE EFFECTS OF TOTAL DARKNESS ON SCHEDULE CONTROL = LES EFFETS DE L'OBSCURITE TOTALE SUR LE CONTROLE D'UN PROGRAMMEROBINSON PW; SHELLEY MF.1974; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 391-400; BIBL. 21REF.Article
SALIENCE OF INITIAL ATTITUDE, MAGNITUDE OF INCENTIVE, AND ATTITUDE CHANGE IN A FORCED COMPLIANCE PARADIGM.TOUHEY JC.1976; MEMORY AND COGNIT.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 4; NO 2; PP. 118-122; BIBL. 25 REF.Article
SHIFTS IN MAGNITUDE OF DELAYED AND IMMEDIATE REWARD.COX WM; BLACK RW.1975; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 6; NO 1; PP. 35-38; BIBL. 12 REF.Article
WITHIN-SUBJECTS POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE CONTRAST EFFECTS IN RATSFLAHERTY CF; LARGEN J.1975; J. COMP. PHYSIOL. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1975; VOL. 88; NO 2; PP. 653-664; BIBL. 22REFArticle
CONTRASTAS A FUNCTION OF COMPONENT DURATIONSHIMP CP; MENLOVE RL.1974; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 4; NO 3; PP. 193-194; BIBL. 10REF.Article
RELATIVE AND ABSOLUTE DENSITY OF REINFORCEMENT AS FACTORS INFLUENCING THE PEAK SHIFTWHEATLEY KL; THOMAS DR.1974; J. EXPER. ANAL. BEHAV.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 22; NO 2; PP. 409-418; BIBL. 10REF.Article
BEHAVIORAL CONTRAST IN A SECOND-ORDER MULTIPLE SEHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENTBILBREY J; WINOKUR S.1974; BULL. PSYCHON. SOC.; U.S.A.; DA. 1974; VOL. 4; NO 3; PP. 206-208; BIBL. 8REF.Article
INTERTRIAL DELAYS AND START BOX CUES IN DIFFERENTIAL CONDITIONING WITH GOLDFISH (CARASSIUS NAURATUS).VAN BERSCHOT SN; WOLACH AH.1976; J. GEN. PSYCHOL.; U.S.A.; DA. 1976; VOL. 94; NO 2; PP. 275-283; BIBL. 8 REF.Article